202-555-0120
4982 Parkway Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017
8AM - 5PM Weekdays
800-888

What is Art?

Although controversial art is not a topic exclusive to the 20th and 21st centuries, the distribution of information regarding controversial art has increased with the proliferation of media. Choose an example of a controversial work of art from the 20th or 21st centuries from any discipline of the humanities (music, literature, sculpture, film, television, etc.). Then, address the following:

Identify the work and the medium.
Based on your example, to what extent does this work of controversial art make a social contribution?
What aesthetic value does the work have? How does it reflect the human condition? How does it relate to your life?
Has this work ever been censored? If so, explain the circumstances.
Are governments ever justified in censoring art? Why or why not?
Examine some of the influences of this work of art.
Argue whether or not this work should be considered art. Explain why using terms learned in this course.
Include an accompanying statement from the artist(s) and a statement from a critic to support your points.
Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page

Rubric
W7 Essay Grading Rubric
W7 Essay Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Length
5.0 pts
Meets length requirement
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
10.0 pts
Submission addresses all aspects of the assignment.
8.5 pts
Submission addresses most aspects of the assignment.
7.5 pts
Submission addresses some aspects of the assignment.
6.0 pts
Submission addresses few aspects of the assignment.
0.0 pts
No effort
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis
35.0 pts
Paper provides an in-depth analysis of the artwork showing a clear understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art.
29.75 pts
Paper provides an strong analysis of the play(s) showing a good understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art, but it could include additional details for support of points or to make analysis clearer.
26.25 pts
Paper provides an in-depth analysis of the play(s) showing a good understanding of the work, the controversy surrounding it, and how if it fits into a definition of art, but examination could be refined and more in depth.
21.0 pts
Analysis of the artwork is limited or unclear, lacking details and support.
0.0 pts
No effort
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Source Integration
5.0 pts
Paper includes reference to scholarly sources within the essay and properly integrates the source.
3.75 pts
Paper includes reference to scholarly sources within the essay but does not properly integrate the source.
0.0 pts
Paper does not make reference to scholarly sources.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity & Flow
10.0 pts
The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety that aids with the flow of ideas.
8.5 pts
The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.
7.5 pts
The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.
6.0 pts
The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.
0.0 pts
No effort
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing: Mechanics & Usage
10.0 pts
The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.
8.5 pts
The writing contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.
7.5 pts
The writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.
6.0 pts
The writing contains several errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.
0.0 pts
No effort
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Paper Format
5.0 pts
Paper is formatted to include all 7 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
4.25 pts
Paper is formatted to include 6 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
3.75 pts
Paper is formatted to include 5 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
3.0 pts
Paper is formatted to include 4 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
0.0 pts
Paper is formatted to include 3 or fewer of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA: Citation and Reference Formatting
5.0 pts
All references include complete bibliographic information for sources and are properly formatted using APA style.
4.25 pts
Most references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style.
3.75 pts
Some of the references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style.
3.0 pts
Few of the references include complete bibliographic information for sources are properly formatted using APA style.

Nursing Reflection

I had a pt with aortic aneurysms.. in the morning I did physical assessment, help the with medication, rounds, Collect vital sign, provide care to the patient.

Reflective Clinical Journal

Submit your graded reflective journals.

Throughout the Nursing Practicum clinical rotation, students will be evaluated based on their ability to demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to provide safe client and family centered care. The clinical instructor will review and respond to student with his or her critique on each written journal to further assist the student and verify that students are meeting the course objectives.

This is a reflective paper, and the use of “I” statements is expected as you describe how your actions met course and your personal objectives. The journal entries must be in sufficient depth that reflects the student’s clinical experience accurately. APA format and clear writing style are expected. Each journal must include a reference page that includes at references utilized by the student during clinical hours

Purpose of the Reflective Clinical Journals

The written clinical journals provide an opportunity to verify that students are meeting STU Undergraduate School of Nursing Learning Outcomes 1-7, critical and creative thinking, quantitative reasoning, scientific and information literacy, communication, diversity, and integration of learning.

Guidelines and instructions

Students will submit a weekly journal starting the third week of clinical.

At the end of each clinical experience, students will submit a written reflective clinical journal on Canvas for evaluation. Students will describe their clinical experience day by providing exemplars of the care they rendered to their clients and how their care was achieved.

The clinical reflective journals must include the following:

personal clinical learning goals/objectives,
client profile(s), HIPPA requirements must be followed to protect client privacy,
Descriptions of the care rendered to the client (s) and how it was achieved using the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) Core Competencies.
a discussion of how goals were met or not met, strengths/needs,
a reflection,
Recommendation of changes in how you would function as a newly graduated BSN
must be 2-3 pages in length, pages that exceed the limit will NOT be read and further points may be removed if critical content was included on the excess pages
Precise APA format that includes correct punctuation, spelling, sentence structure, and references. The “easy” online APA software has errors and should NOT be used.
type, Times Roman, 12-point font, and double-spaced,
a reference page with at least 3 recent (not older than 5 years) peer-reviewed nursing articles, books, drug book/guide, laboratory and diagnostics manual, policy & procedure manual, and
Submit the assignment on canvas by the due date.
Falsification and/or fabrication of journal entries and /or clinical hours are examples of academic dishonesty that will result in immediate failure of the course.

Radiation Biology

* Requirements Title Page, 3-5 pages long, and Bibliography which is the citation end of the paper. * 3 Sources (Text Book should be one of them I already attached it as pdf , the aother two sources you choose use the biography at the end of the chapter for some good ideas). * citation need to be as APA. * I choose for the topic lung cancer please read Chapter 24 for the specific types of cancer for which clinical studies have been reviewed, then research current retreatment options or clinical trials.* MORE THAN HALF OF THE PAPER should be dedicated to giving a broad overview of the cancer itself, the current treatment options available and most widely used and the current statistics (American Cancer Society). A summary of the clinical studies overview given in the book should also be included in this discussion. * Then the remaining pages is to wrap the paper up, think about IF you were previously diagnosed with this cancer and had gone through treatment 5 years ago, would you pursue retreatment, why or why not. If, in your research you come across any current clinical trials, feel free to discuss that as well. * Grading: The paper will be graded predominantly on your ability to effectively summarize the vast amount of information about the topic you are assigned. Grading is also based on your ability to tie in your personal thoughts and feelings about IF you had to choose retreatment. Not following the requirement or not submitting the work on time, i WILL AKS FOR REFUND because I dont have time for revision. I f you have any question as please as soon as possible not a day or a night before the due which usually happen in all my last experience. phone number ***

Individual Project Assignment

Hello writer: Here is the Assignment requirement:
Select a new product/service. Product or service must not be more than 2 years old. Write a 1-page outline covering the following:
• position – its niche/value

• branding strategy

• follower or leader strategy

• internal strengths and financial-risk

Attach a picture or link showing the product; if using a service, attach a copy of brochures or promotional materials.

Research Critique

Assignment Criteria:

Select one of the following research articles for Assignment 2:

Underhill, M., Roper, K., Siefert, M., Boucher, J., & Berry, D. (2015). Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation before and after an initiative to promote evidence-based nursing in an ambulatory oncology setting. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 12(2), 70-78.

Irwin, M., Bergman R., & Richards, R. (2013). The experience of implementing evidence-based practice change: A qualitative analysis. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(5), 544-549.

1. Select a research article;

2. Copy and paste the appropriate research critique grid found in Week 4 into a new Word document. (Attached below)
3. Complete each section of the research critique grid. The “Analysis” section of the research critique grid should be specific. Use
bullet points for this section and support each yes/no analysis with comments.
4. Critique the article and include the strengths and weaknesses.
5. The research critique grid should be added as an appendix to this paper.
6. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format 2-3 pages, excluding the title, reference and appendix pages.
7. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, body (summary page) and a conclusion.
8. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
9. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we,
you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
10. Include the chosen article in the reference page.
11. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).

Case Conceptualization and Treatment Plan

To help your self with this assignment, you need to look at Appendix A Cognitive Case Write-up (pages 361-365) of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Book. Chapters 2,3,5 and 19 should also help you out in this project. For those of you who did not get your CBT Book, I am attaching the chapters here.

Your pager should be between 6-8 pages long covering all the elements in the case study instructions and the Rubric. I have attached an example here from previous years to help you out. However, this example is meet expectations only. To get better grade, you need to develop your paper using headings and structure. You need to follow Appendix A in your work and add to it things like developing the therapeutic rapport and some assessment of depression (some suggested assessment are in Appendix B at the end of the book). You can also use assessment tools from online (e.g., Psychologytools.com), Beck Inventories such as (Beck Depression Inventory), and CBT information from your CBT book and from websites such as PostivePsychology.Com for activities and homework to be given to the client. For Grading you need to review your Rubric.

I will upload the chapters and an example of how the assignment should look like, and the above description explains what should be done, please no plagiarism, if you had any questions do not hesitate to contact me

Writer’s Choice

Reflection Paper #1:

Find a news report about a recent scientific study. It doesn’t have to be a psychology study.
Provide a link to or copy of the report so that your TA can refer to it when reading your
reflection paper and potentially use it as an example in the class discussion. Are the claims
made or implied in the article’s headline and main text supported by the scientific evidence
provided in the article? Are causal claims being made based on correlational data? Might there
be a third variable at play that could explain the results, self-selection or other issues
emphasized in Chapter 2? Can you think of any alternative explanations for the results relevant
to the concepts discussed in Chapter 2 of GKCN? If so, consider what kind(s) of evidence one
would need in order to support the journalist’s claims.

Relevant reading: GKCN Chapter 2

*All reflection paper should be no longer than 1 single-spaced page (margins no smaller than 1″; font size no smaller than 11 point).

Before you find the link, please read the GKCN chapter 2 that I uploaded. When you write the essay, you need to compare the news report and GKCN reading. Also, Please send me the news report link so I can get approve from TA. Thanks

I mean that reading provides the Newsreport guidelines such as the value of social psychology research, how social psychologists test ideas, the criteria of sound research, Ethical concerns in social psychology research. Please read carefully and find the newsreport(research) that meets these reading guidelines. Thanks 🙂

Let me know if you have question. Send me the news report link(appropriate) first before you start.

Leadership – Individual PLDP Project

Files attached descriptions:

This file “Abdulaelah Edit – BUSE 615 PLDP Assignment Guide – Conceptual Framework” is the guide line of the project, please follow it carefully.

This file “Guidelines Notes” has more details on the project which might help you.


Please follow those guidelines carefully, the doctor is a very detailed person.
I’ll attach after placing this order, one of my friends work, please don’t do the same just get the idea on how to do it.

Please use the number of sources you need

Thanks

Watoto wao08

Hapa kunakaa luna kamaneno sasa hata sijui kutakuwa aje. Kwa hivyo itatakiwa tuwe macho sana ili tutoboe

For your Artifact Project Paper, you will need to achieve these goals:

1. Paper should be 6 pages long, not including the bibliography

2. Paper should describe the cultural context that the artifact was part of during the time of its manufacture and use. To do this you will have to utilize the identification provided (for example, Sican mask) and then do research on that culture/context (what is Sican? Where was the culture located? What time period? How was the society organized?)

3. Paper must utilize sources that extends our knowledge of the item beyond the artifact description provided on the DMA website

4. Paper should investigate the status of archaeological/historical sites in the presumed source area attributed to the artifact. Is this an area that has an active history of collecting and/or looting? Is it likely that the item was removed from an archaeological/historical site or context? If so, is there evidence of an active art/artifact market in this sort of item?

5. Paper should conclude with a discussion of the relevance of the item to art historical and/or archaeological knowledge. It is simply an artistic object, or does it have archaeological/historical importance?