4982 Parkway Street, Los Angeles, CA 90017
8AM - 5PM Weekdays

A lab report on the fictional Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study

[Type Title Here in Title Case]


Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne

[Subject Code]: [Subject Name]


[Due Date]

[Word Count]


[Write a summary of the work in a paragraph of no more than 250 words. This paragraph should be double-spaced, aligned left, with no first-line indent. Note that the title and abstract do not contribute to the final word count for the report.]

Keywords: [Click here to add keywords.]

[Type Title Here in Title Case]



Sixty participants took part in the study, 30 of whom were allocated to the hands condition (16 female, 14 male; aged 18-30 years; M = 24.03, SD = 3.33) and 30 of whom were allocated to the Shepard figures condition (15 female, 15 male, aged 18-29 years; M = 23.60, SD = 2.87). All participants were right-handed, had normal or corrected-to-normal vision, and had no history of psychological of neurological disorders.

Materials and Measures

A transcranial magnetic simulator (TMS) equipped with a figure eight coil was used. This was placed tangentially over the hand area of the left primary motor cortex with the handle pointing backward and rotated 45° away from the midline. Stimuli were presented on the 21” flat screen of a Dell PC using the Presentation Software Package. Stimuli were either Shepard figures (Shepard & Metzler, 1971) or hands (Bode et al., 2007) which were approximately constant in size (maximum of 10cm).

Procedure and Design

Participants were seated approximately 70 cm (+/- 4) from the computer screen. Their task was to mentally rotate the left object to see if it could be made to match the object on the right. A positive match could be made in half of the trials, whereas in the other half the object was mirrored. The degree of rotation necessary to come to either a “same” or “different” judgement ranged between 45° and 315° degrees. For each category there were three objects, each presented at four different viewing angles. All stimuli were shown twice, once for “same” and once for “different”, leading to 24 trials in total per block for each condition which were randomized.

Participants were instructed to mentally rotate each object in order to decide whether it was the same or different. They were asked to do this as quickly and accurately as possible indicating their decision using one of two buttons with their right hand. There were six experimental blocks which were preceded by a practice block. On odd blocks real TMS was applied (i.e., a TMS pulse was applied at random intervals). On even blocks sham TMS was applied (i.e., TMS coil is not discharged). An average mean RT for TMS blocks and Sham blocks, for both hands and Shepard Figures conditions was obtained and compared using a one-tailed paired samples t-test.




Optional Self-Assessment Form

Read through the assessment criteria and assess your own performance. Select the option you believe best represents how well you satisfied the criteria. Your tutor will not base your mark on this self-assessment in any way. This task is intended to help you better gauge your own progress and to identify your own personal strengths and weaknesses. (Note that this form counts as supplemental material and therefore should not be counted in the final word count).

Overall Impression    
In your judgment, what is the overall quality of the current work?  
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
A. Title and Abstract   Weight
Title Content Clearly and concisely outlines the main topic of the research, including the relationship between key variables. 1%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Abstract (Background) Describes the problem under investigation (i.e., the research topic). 1%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Abstract (Method) Describes relevant sample characteristics (e.g., number of participants, age, gender composition) and essential features of the study method (e.g., study design, outcome measures, data-gathering and analysis procedures). 1%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Abstract (Results) Describes the main findings, including effect sizes and statistical significance levels (i.e., p values), where appropriate. 1%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Abstract (Discussion) Discusses the implications of the study’s findings with regard to the problem under investigation. 1%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
B. Introduction   Weight
Opening Opens by introducing the problem under investigation and outlining its importance. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Literature Review (Relevance and Understanding) Provides a succinct and focused review of literature relevant to the problem.Summarizes key background information accurately and in appropriate detail. 10%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Literature Review (Rationale) Develops a cogent rationale by critically evaluating the literature and explaining how the current study builds on prior research. 10%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Aims and Hypotheses Outlines the purpose and scope of the study and generates specific hypotheses for testing. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
C. Method   Weight
Participants Describes the participants involved in the research. In most cases, this includes: Number of participants in total and in relevant subgroups.Descriptive statistics for years of age.Gender composition of the sample.Other major demographic characteristics as warranted by the studyEligibility and exclusion criteria.

Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Materials and Measures Describes all outcome measures, and the materials used to derive them, with sufficient detail to facilitate reproducibility.

Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Procedure and Design Describes the procedures that were carried out in the study, including a detailed outline of how participants were allocated to groups or conditions and the specific steps involved in collecting and analysing data.

Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
D. Results   Weight
Statistical Information Presents all relevant statistical information accurately and completely. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Presentation Describes the results of each analysis appropriately and presents statistical and mathematical information in correct APA Style format.Presents results in an organized manner, following the structure set by the study’s design and the order of the aims and hypotheses.Avoids making interpretive comments that are better suited for the Discussion (e.g., interpreting what the result means for the hypotheses stated in the Introduction). 10%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Tables and Figures Presents at least one table or figure which is referred to and described appropriately in text.Tables/figures conform to the requirements of APA Style.Each table/figure serves a purpose and does not merely duplicate information contained in the text or in another table or figure. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
E. Discussion   Weight
Hypotheses Opens with a clear statement summarizing the aims and hypotheses and indicating whether the hypotheses were supported or not. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Interpretation Considers how the study’s findings are similar to or different from relevant prior work.Considers what the results mean for the problem under investigation, particularly with regard to the specific issues raised in the Introduction.Reflects on how the study advances scholarship in the field without overstating the importance of the study and its findings.

Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Future Directions Suggests future directions informed by problems that remain unresolved, new questions that have arisen as a consequence of the study’s findings, or limitations in the design of the study that may need to be addressed in future work. 10%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Conclusions Concludes by briefly returning to a discussion of why the problem is important and how the findings relate to the overarching issues motivating the research. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
F. Writing/Presentation   Weight
Written Expression Demonstrates clarity and conciseness in written expression.Demonstrates continuity and flow within and across all sections of the report.Exhibits a professional tone suitable for academic writing.Word choice is appropriate and sentences are well-constructed, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or usage.Contains an appropriate amount of original material. 5%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Report Formatting Adheres to APA Style formatting requirements (e.g., with regard to pagination, capitalization, punctuation, headings, line spacing, paragraph alignment and indentation). 2%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  
Referencing Works are cited appropriately in-text and in the reference list, following the requirements of APA Style. 3%
Your rating: N ☐ P ☐ H3 ☐ H2B ☐ H2A ☐ H1 ☐  

Hospitality In Different Cultures

PSY 430 – Cultural Psychology

Critical Analysis Essay of Cross Cultural Differences on Personality

Inquiry and Critical Thinking Rubric

In this analysis, students are expected to showcase the ability to engage in critical analysis of cross cultural differences on relationships.

Students will learn various modes of inquiry through interdisciplinary curricula—problem

posing, investigating, conceptualizing—in order to become active, self-motivated, and empowered learners.

Additional requirements:

  • Papers should be submitted in APA format, 5 to 7 pages with a minimum 5 references.
  • All papers should include an individual reflection on the experience. The reflection should come at the end of your paper and includes your learning after completing your critical analysis. This is different from your interpretation of the sections discussed within the paper.
  • Essays done as a group should be submitted individually with their personal reflection contained within their paper.

6 (Highest)—Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of view. Generates alternative explanations of phenomena or event.

Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.

Makes ethical judgments.

5—Does most the following:

Accurately interprets evidence, statements, graphics, questions, etc.

Thinks through issues by identifying relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and con. Offers analysis and evaluation of obvious alternative points of view.

Generates alternative explanations of phenomena or event. Justifies (by using) some results or procedures, explains reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.

Case Conceptualization and Treatment Plan

To help your self with this assignment, you need to look at Appendix A Cognitive Case Write-up (pages 361-365) of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Book. Chapters 2,3,5 and 19 should also help you out in this project. For those of you who did not get your CBT Book, I am attaching the chapters here.

Your pager should be between 6-8 pages long covering all the elements in the case study instructions and the Rubric. I have attached an example here from previous years to help you out. However, this example is meet expectations only. To get better grade, you need to develop your paper using headings and structure. You need to follow Appendix A in your work and add to it things like developing the therapeutic rapport and some assessment of depression (some suggested assessment are in Appendix B at the end of the book). You can also use assessment tools from online (e.g., Psychologytools.com), Beck Inventories such as (Beck Depression Inventory), and CBT information from your CBT book and from websites such as PostivePsychology.Com for activities and homework to be given to the client. For Grading you need to review your Rubric.

I will upload the chapters and an example of how the assignment should look like, and the above description explains what should be done, please no plagiarism, if you had any questions do not hesitate to contact me

Writer’s Choice

Reflection Paper #1:

Find a news report about a recent scientific study. It doesn’t have to be a psychology study.
Provide a link to or copy of the report so that your TA can refer to it when reading your
reflection paper and potentially use it as an example in the class discussion. Are the claims
made or implied in the article’s headline and main text supported by the scientific evidence
provided in the article? Are causal claims being made based on correlational data? Might there
be a third variable at play that could explain the results, self-selection or other issues
emphasized in Chapter 2? Can you think of any alternative explanations for the results relevant
to the concepts discussed in Chapter 2 of GKCN? If so, consider what kind(s) of evidence one
would need in order to support the journalist’s claims.

Relevant reading: GKCN Chapter 2

*All reflection paper should be no longer than 1 single-spaced page (margins no smaller than 1″; font size no smaller than 11 point).

Before you find the link, please read the GKCN chapter 2 that I uploaded. When you write the essay, you need to compare the news report and GKCN reading. Also, Please send me the news report link so I can get approve from TA. Thanks

I mean that reading provides the Newsreport guidelines such as the value of social psychology research, how social psychologists test ideas, the criteria of sound research, Ethical concerns in social psychology research. Please read carefully and find the newsreport(research) that meets these reading guidelines. Thanks 🙂

Let me know if you have question. Send me the news report link(appropriate) first before you start.